Australia

Marshall Is.

New Zealand

St. Helena (U.K.)

Australia & Oceania

Antigua and Barbuda

Caribbean Netherlands (Neth.)

Cuba

Seychelles

Trinidad and Tobago

Caribbean

Kazakhstan

Central Asia

Japan

East Asia

Georgia

Eurasia

Albania

Belgium

Bulgaria

Croatia

Cyprus

Estonia

Finland

Ireland

Italy

Latvia

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Europe

Belize

Chile

Colombia

Guatemala

Nicaragua

Latin America

Mauritius

None

Canada

United States

North America

Pakistan

South Asia

Indonesia

Malaysia

Myanmar

Philippines

Southeast Asia

Iran

Lebanon

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Tunisia

Turkey

Yemen

Southwest Asia and North Africa

Angola

Cabo Verde

Comoros

Gambia

Kenya

Mozambique

Namibia

Tanzania

Togo

Sub-Saharan Africa

A map highlights fishing sustainability by country. Dark green shows over 75 percent sustainability in Canada, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kazakhstan, and Finland. Light green, under 25 percent, includes most South Asian countries (Myanmar, Turkey).

Countries

World

Fishing Sustainability

Percent

Afghanistan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Uzbekistan

China

Mongolia

Nepal

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Russia

Belarus

India

Sri Lanka

Cambodia

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation members, observers, and dialogue partners. Member states (black) include Russia and China. Observer states (yellow) include India, Iran, and Afghanistan. Dialogue partners (blue) include Turkey and Cambodia.

Member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, a political, economic, and security organization created in 2001

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation

Arizona

Utah

Florida

Washington

Kentucky

Mississippi

Louisiana

Oregon

Alabama

Wisconsin

Michigan

Pennsylvania

Nevada

California

Ohio

Indiana

Minnesota

Illinois

A world map highlights weaker-performing cities during the 2008-2009 recession, depicted in orange. Key regions include California, Oregon, and Nevada on the West Coast, the Midwest around Chicago, and the Southeast, particularly Florida.

Portions of the United States where cities had weak economic performance relative to other U.S. cities

Regions of Weaker-Performing Cities

nature

Alaska

Arkansas

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Hawaii

Idaho

Iowa

Kansas

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Oklahoma

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Vermont

Virginia

West Virginia

Wyoming

A map shows the electoral votes for the U. S. presidential election by state in 2004. The states won by Kerry are highlighted in blue western and eastern America, while than won by Bush are in red like Central America, Alaska.

Electoral vote totals for the 2004 presidential election by state

US / CA States

U.S. National Archives

U.S. Presidential Election by State: Electoral Votes, 2004

Anthropogenic Biomes

Areas at Risk of Soil Degradation

Average Annual Precipitation

Biomes

Climate Zones

Global Mean Temperature, January

Global Mean Temperature, July

Global Surface Warming: Worst-Case Projections (NASA)

Insolation

Land Cover

Major Soil Orders

Prevailing Agricultural Practices

World Elevations

Fishing Sustainability			Shanghai Cooperation Organisation	Regions of Weaker-Performing Cities	U.S. Presidential Election by State: Electoral Votes, 2004
Class	Rank	Percent	Value	Regions of Weaker-Performing Cities	Value












				48.8%