Australia

New Zealand

Australia & Oceania

Dominican Republic

Haiti

Caribbean

Kazakhstan

Tajikistan

Uzbekistan

Central Asia

China

Japan

Nepal

South Korea

East Asia

Azerbaijan

Russia

Eurasia

Austria

Belarus

Belgium

Bulgaria

Czechia

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Ireland

Italy

Netherlands

Norway

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Serbia

Slovakia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Europe

Argentina

Bolivia

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Costa Rica

Ecuador

El Salvador

Guatemala

Honduras

Nicaragua

Panama

Paraguay

Peru

Uruguay

Venezuela

Latin America

Canada

Mexico

United States

North America

Bangladesh

India

Pakistan

Sri Lanka

South Asia

Cambodia

Indonesia

Laos

Malaysia

Myanmar

Philippines

Singapore

Thailand

Vietnam

Southeast Asia

Algeria

Bahrain

Egypt

Israel

Jordan

Kuwait

Morocco

Oman

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Syria

Tunisia

Turkey

United Arab Emirates

Yemen

Southwest Asia and North Africa

Angola

Benin

Botswana

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cameroon

Chad

Côte d'Ivoire

Democratic Republic of Congo

Ethiopia

Ghana

Guinea

Kenya

Madagascar

Malawi

Mali

Mozambique

Niger

Nigeria

Rwanda

Senegal

Sierra Leone

South Africa

Sudan

Tanzania

Togo

Uganda

Zambia

Sub-Saharan Africa

A map shows global food security scores. Highest score areas (dark blue): The U.S., Canada, China and Australia. Lowest scores (red), prevalent in many African countries (Niger, Sudan, Angola), and Venezuela.

A scoring of food security (0-100, with 100 being the most secure) constructed from 34 indicators to assess which countries are most and least vulnerable to food insecurity through the categories of affordability, availability, quality &amp; safety, as well as the impact of natural resources and resilience have on food security.

Countries

World

Global Food Security Index

Global Food Security

Score

The 2008 presidential election in the United States pitted Republican John McCain against Democrat Barack Obama. This layer portrays the popular vote results at the county and county-equivalent level. The map portrays the winner of the popular vote while data probing, placing the mouse over a county, displays the percentage of the vote for each candidate and the total number of votes cast. In the 2008 election, Mr. Obama won most of the counties containing major urban centers. He also won much of California, coastal Washington and Oregon, northern New Mexico, Central Colorado, much of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and northern Illinois. He also won southern Texas, the counties along the southern Mississippi River, a zone extending from central Mississippi through central Alabama, South Carolina and eastern North Carolina. He also won most of the counties on the eastern seaboard from Washington and Baltimore northeast through New England. Mr. McCain won most of the interior of the country outside of those areas previously mentioned. Mr. McCain won the Alaskan municipalities while Mr. Obama won the counties of Hawaii.

Percentage of the popular vote by county that went to John McCain versus Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election

US Counties

Data.gov

U.S. Presidential Election: Popular Vote by County, 2008

Fiji

Papua New Guinea

Samoa

Bahamas

Barbados

Cuba

Jamaica

St. Lucia

Trinidad and Tobago

Afghanistan

Kyrgyzstan

Turkmenistan

Mongolia

Armenia

Georgia

Albania

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Croatia

Cyprus

Estonia

Iceland

Latvia

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Moldova

Montenegro

Northern Macedonia

Slovenia

Belize

Guyana

Suriname

Mauritania

Mauritius

São Tomé and Príncipe

Tonga

None

Bhutan

Maldives

Timor-Leste

Iran

Iraq

Lebanon

Libya

Central African Republic

eSwatini

Gabon

Gambia

Guinea-Bissau

Lesotho

Liberia

Namibia

Republic of the Congo

South Sudan

Zimbabwe

In North America, Canada, Mexico, and most Central American and Caribbean countries saw change between 3 and 88 percent in the Gender Inequality Index. In the United States, the change was between 1 and 3 percent. In most South American countries, change was between 3 and 88 percent, except for Brazil (between 1 and 3 percent) and Venezuela (between 1 and –4 percent). In Europe, most countries had change between 3 and 88 percent. In Africa, most countries report no data. However, almost all of those for which there are data had change between 3 and 88 percent: Algeria, Libya, Gabon, Rwanda, Burundi, Namibia, Botswana, and South Africa. Morocco had change between 1 and –4 percent. In Southwest, Central, and South Asia, most countries lack data. However, in Southwest Asia, Turkey, Armenia, Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, and United Arab Emirates are between 3 and 88 percent; Iran is between 1 and 3 percent; and Kuwait is between –4 and –8 percent. In Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan are between 3 and 88 percent. In South Asia, Nepal and Sri Lanka are between 3 and 88 percent. In Southeast and East Asia and Oceania, all countries for which there are data are between 3 and 88 percent, except for South Korea, which is between –8 and –42 percent.

Percent change in Gender Inequality Index values between 2011 and 2021, by country. The Gender Inequality Index measures achievement between women and men in three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment, and the labor market.

Change in Gender Inequality Index, 2011-2021

Percentage of change

American Samoa (U.S.)

Cook Is. (New Zealand)

French Polynesia (France)

Guam (U.S.)

Kiribati

Global Food Security				Change in Gender Inequality Index, 2011-2021			Life Expectancy			Water Resources Vulnerability							U.S. Presidential Election: Electoral Votes, 2020
Class	Rank	Score	U.S. Presidential Election: Popular Vote by County, 2008	Class	Rank	Percentage of change	Class	Rank	Years	No data	Arid and low water use	Low (<10%)	Low-medium (10-20%)	Medium-high (20-40%)	High (40-80%)	Extremely high (>80%)	Value












										0.654%	3.65%	47.2%	4.86%	6.22%	9.97%	14.9%