Fiji

Kiribati

Marshall Is.

Micronesia

Nauru

Palau

Papua New Guinea

Samoa

Solomon Is.

Tuvalu

Australia & Oceania

Antigua and Barbuda

Cuba

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Grenada

Haiti

Jamaica

Seychelles

St. Lucia

St. Vincent and the Grenadines

Caribbean

Afghanistan

Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Central Asia

China

Mongolia

Nepal

North Korea

East Asia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Georgia

Eurasia

Albania

Belarus

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Kosovo

Moldova

Montenegro

Northern Macedonia

Serbia

Ukraine

Europe

Argentina

Belize

Bolivia

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Costa Rica

Ecuador

El Salvador

Guatemala

Guyana

Honduras

Nicaragua

Panama

Paraguay

Peru

Suriname

Uruguay

Venezuela

Latin America

Mauritania

Mauritius

São Tomé and Príncipe

Tonga

Vanuatu

None

Mexico

North America

Bangladesh

Bhutan

India

Maldives

Pakistan

Sri Lanka

South Asia

Cambodia

Indonesia

Laos

Malaysia

Myanmar

Philippines

Thailand

Timor-Leste

Vietnam

Southeast Asia

Algeria

Egypt

Iran

Iraq

Jordan

Lebanon

Libya

Morocco

Palestine

Syria

Tunisia

Turkey

Yemen

Southwest Asia and North Africa

Angola

Benin

Botswana

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cabo Verde

Cameroon

Central African Republic

Chad

Comoros

Côte d'Ivoire

Democratic Republic of Congo

Djibouti

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

eSwatini

Ethiopia

Gabon

Gambia

Ghana

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Kenya

Lesotho

Liberia

Madagascar

Malawi

Mali

Mozambique

Namibia

Niger

Nigeria

Republic of the Congo

Rwanda

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Somalia

South Africa

South Sudan

Sudan

Tanzania

Togo

Uganda

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Sub-Saharan Africa

A world map shows the net official development assistance received per capita in various countries. The highest aid regions (dark blue) include Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, and Tanzania. Most regions in Brazil, India, and China have the lowest aid (light yellow).

Per capita multilateral aid received in U.S. dollars

Countries

World

World Bank

Aid Dependency: Net Official Development Assistance Received per Capita 

US dollars

United States

Impact of the 2008–2009 recession in the U.S. with dots indicating performance levels. Darkest blue (strongest) in Washington, D.C., dark blue (second strongest) in Denver, medium blue (moderate) in Chicago, and lightest blue (weakest) in Miami.

Impact of the 2008–2009 economic recession on selected metropolitan areas of the United States

Performance during 2008–2009 Recession

nature

Performance during 2008–2009 Recession (U.S.)

American Samoa (U.S.)

Australia

Cook Is. (New Zealand)

French Polynesia (France)

Guam (U.S.)

New Zealand

Niue (New Zealand)

Norfolk I. (Australia)

Northern Mariana Is. (U.S.)

Pitcairn Is. (U.K.)

St. Helena (U.K.)

Anguilla (U.K.)

Aruba (Neth.)

Bahamas

Barbados

Bermuda (U.K.)

British Virgin Is. (U.K.)

Cayman Is. (U.K.)

St. Barthélemy (France)

St. Kitts and Nevis

St. Martin (France)

Trinidad and Tobago

Turks and Caicos Is. (U.K.)

U.S. Virgin Is. (U.S.)

Hong Kong S.A.R. (China)

Japan

Macau S.A.R. (China)

South Korea

Taiwan

Russia

Andorra

Austria

Belgium

Bulgaria

Croatia

Aid Dependency: Net Official Development Assistance Received per Capita			Performance during 2008–2009 Recession (U.S.)					Population Growth Rates
Class	Rank	US dollars	Strongest	Second strongest	Middle	Second weakest	Weakest	Class	Rank	Percentage of change








			18	18	20	17	17